Score concepts on evidence, not the loudest voice in the room
For innovation teams: rank ideas and features with real customer data.
Build what works. Skip what doesn't. Let the evidence decide.
Concept and roadmap decisions too often go to whoever argues hardest. Research Rocket lets you test concepts with real customers and rank them on evidence, so the portfolio reflects demand instead of politics.
Start your 7-day free trial · See pricing
The problem
- Concepts get compared with no defensible way to rank them.
- Roadmap bets are made on opinion and internal conviction.
- You can't show leadership why one idea beat another.
- Testing many concepts quickly is operationally painful.
How Research Rocket helps
- Field — Run concept and preference tests and surveys with your target customers.
- Synthesize — AI coding, Jobs-to-be-Done, and real statistics quantify the signal.
- Score — Decision scoring ranks concepts on evidence, with the risk and expected value shown.
What you get
- Concept and preference testing plus surveys with real statistical analysis.
- Decision scoring and a decision studio to rank ideas across the portfolio.
- Neuro attention signals and Jobs-to-be-Done to explain why an idea resonates.
FAQ
How do we evaluate competing concepts?
Field concept or preference tests in Research Rocket, let it synthesize and quantify the responses, and use decision scoring to rank the concepts on evidence with risk and expected value attached.
Can we defend the ranking to leadership?
Yes. Each score ties back to customer data and stated criteria, so the portfolio decision is explainable rather than political.
Is it fast enough to test many ideas?
Yes — studies are self-serve to field, and AI synthesis handles the analysis, so testing several concepts is practical, not a bottleneck.
Build what works. Skip what doesn't. Let the evidence decide. Start your 7-day free trial →
Related: For founders · For product managers · For UX researchers · Pricing